- VIVADESIGNER TURN OFF MODE DRIVER
- VIVADESIGNER TURN OFF MODE FULL
- VIVADESIGNER TURN OFF MODE SOFTWARE
- VIVADESIGNER TURN OFF MODE PROFESSIONAL
Use the tools you need for the job, aiming at result production while keeping a liquid approach.ĭepending on your skills, willpower, effort, and willingness to abandon uninventive corporations you can be faster and more efficient.
VIVADESIGNER TURN OFF MODE FULL
Much like you can aim at 0% environment pollution by gradually removing excess stuff instead of going full off the grid, you don't have to do a radical move. Jokes aside you don't have to do it if you're scared, and if you want to try you can always switch back and forth between machines / OSs so you use the most suited environment according to the limits of context and the job you need to do. Better even, considering that the extra baggage of complex tools would actually slow them down rather than speed them up.įreedom is hard, and thingsbcosts money if you're not willing to put willpower - more news at 11 For many non-professionals, people just editing a config file, or people making the occasional shell script, it does work fine.
VIVADESIGNER TURN OFF MODE SOFTWARE
If you were hiring someone to craft the image of your company in a crowded, competitive marketplace, would you pay them more to take longer and potentially end up with a suboptimal product just because they were only using OSS to do it?Ī software developer could feasibly use something like windows notepad or pine to achieve the same results as an IDE, or even a more powerful text editor like SublimeText.
VIVADESIGNER TURN OFF MODE PROFESSIONAL
Sure, with varying amounts (usually non-trivial) of extra effort I can cobble together a disparate set of tools that might sometimes yield similar results to professional design programs, but it's going to take significantly more work to produce possibly lower-quality results, and that's just not an option for a pro. Whenever I say that, a billion people always jump in and say "Gimp and VivaDesigner and Natron and XYZ and PDQ" work fine for me," and to my astonishment, they always seem surprised that the same just isn't true in most (any?) professional workflows. What about tools that work natively on Linux? They generally just don't work for professional design use.
VIVADESIGNER TURN OFF MODE DRIVER
Having some weird graphics tablet driver problem or something can really kill the creative connection between me and my work, and if I'm coming down to the wire on a deadline, it can cost me a contract. Why don't I just run a closed-source OS in a VM? They are fussy. It's not a lack of understanding of how it works- Before I was a designer I was a developer, worked in IT for a while, worked in upper-level support for a while, and Linux was my primary personal and professional OS from the late 90s to like 2010. I'd love to switch to Linux, but as a designer, I'm stuck. But then I think the difficulty of the exercise is in setting the "correct" level of complexity for this operation. While macOS does (for the moment) have this hatch, it looks maybe /too/ complex. But those OSs need to have an "escape hatch" for someone who actually wants those features disabled and actually understands the risks of disabling them. In the end, I think the best way is for such features to be the default setup.
Having people go through hoops and click through warning messages would probably also push companies to better design their software. So I think that for an OS like macOS, where most people flock "because it just works and has no viruses", strict defaults are a sane choice. While most of Linux's audience (and probably practically all of NetBSD's) is rather technically inclined and could possibly be expected to turn on the security features as they need them, most of Windows' and macOS's audience will very likely have no idea that there is even an option to do this.Īlso, software companies would probably take the easy route and just assume that since those features aren't enable by default, most people don't enable them and develop their software in a way which could be incompatible with them. It seems to me that the issue with this approach is that those commercial OSs have to deal with a way more diverse audience than NetBSD and even Linux.
0 kommentar(er)
